![](https://bharatshakti.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/LT-BSI-Defence.gif")
In a development of major diplomatic and counterterrorism significance, the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) has, for the first time, named The Resistance Front (TRF) in an official document, directly implicating the group in the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack that killed 26 civilians in Jammu and Kashmir. The revelation was made in the 36th report of the UNSC’s Analytical Support and Sanctions Monitoring Team (MT), submitted to the 1267 Sanctions Committee.
The MT report documents TRF’s claim of responsibility for the attack, noting that the group not only publicly asserted its involvement on the day of the incident but also published visual evidence. Although TRF later retracted its statement, the UN report cites multiple member states affirming that the attack could not have been executed without logistical and strategic support from Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT). One country went as far as to say TRF and LeT are essentially interchangeable, reinforcing long-standing allegations about Pakistan’s role in sustaining proxy terror outfits in the region.
A Strategic Setback for Pakistan
The inclusion of TRF in the UN document marks a sharp blow to Pakistan’s narrative management strategy. In April, Islamabad had successfully lobbied to remove any reference to TRF in a UNSC press statement condemning the Pahalgam attack. The move was celebrated in Pakistan’s National Assembly by its Foreign Minister as a diplomatic win. However, the Monitoring Team report now reverses that omission, restoring TRF’s name in an authoritative and consensus-based UN document—thereby exposing what Indian officials describe as Pakistan’s “deceitful tactics.”
India’s External Affairs Minister, S Jaishankar, referenced this in the Lok Sabha earlier this week, pointing out the irony of Pakistan defending TRF publicly only to have it designated a terrorist organisation by the United States weeks later. “This is what credibility at the global stage looks like,” Jaishankar said, citing the UN report as validation of India’s consistent position on Pakistan’s terror sponsorship.
Diplomatic Weight of the Monitoring Team Report
MT reports are adopted through consensus by all 15 members of the Security Council, lending them significant diplomatic gravity. The fact that TRF has been identified in such a document, despite Pakistan’s reported attempts to block the move, demonstrates growing international consensus on Pakistan’s complicity in cross-border terrorism.
It is also the first instance since 2019 that LeT or its affiliates have been directly named in a UNSC sanctions document. Analysts say this reflects a reawakening of international focus on state-backed terrorism in South Asia, particularly in Jammu and Kashmir.
The TRF and Pakistan’s Proxy Strategy
Established in 2019, The Resistance Front is widely recognised by intelligence agencies as a front organisation for LeT. Pakistan’s use of TRF and similarly named entities like the “People Against Fascist Front” has been interpreted as a calculated attempt to disguise jihadist operations behind secular-sounding titles, thereby giving the impression of a local insurgency in Kashmir rather than cross-border terrorism.
Broader Counterterrorism Context
The Monitoring Team’s report comes shortly after the United States officially designated TRF as a Foreign Terrorist Organisation (FTO) and added it to its list of Specially Designated Global Terrorists. The designation, issued on July 17 by the U.S. State Department, cited TRF’s operational and financial links to LeT.
India has also taken decisive action. In response to the Pahalgam attack, Indian forces launched Operation Sindoor, targeting terror infrastructure across the Line of Control, including sites in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK).
With the UN officially documenting TRF’s involvement and its connection to LeT, Pakistan’s strategy of muddying appears to be unravelling under global scrutiny.
As regional tensions remain high, the report warns that terrorist groups could seek to exploit the fragile security environment, making the need for unified international pressure against state-sponsored terror more urgent than ever.
Huma Siddiqui
