![](https://bharatshakti.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/LT-BSI-Defence.gif")
Pakistan’s recent missile demonstration has been promoted as a major breakthrough, an event meant to showcase new maritime strength and a growing ability to threaten India’s naval power. The launch footage is dramatic at first glance: a missile rises sharply, a plume of exhaust fills the deck, and a distant splash signals impact. But a closer look reveals that the test offers far less than the narrative surrounding it suggests. The controlled setting, lack of a threat environment, and absence of fleet coordination all indicate that this was a display, not a demonstration of real capability.
The test lacked defensive, fleet, and operational context. It was a missile launch, not a naval engagement, and that distinction is decisive.
On November 25, 2025, the Pakistan Navy conducted another test flight of its indigenously developed ship-launched anti-ship ballistic missile (ASBM), locally designated as P-282 “SMASH.” The Pakistan Navy has stated that the missile is designed to target both maritime and land objectives. It is equipped with a modern guidance system that allows for precise engagement and terminal manoeuvring. Although official specifications have not been released, sources in Pakistan suggest that the missile has a range of about 350 km. The system is currently in development and is intended to meet national needs rather than for export.
No Air Defence, No Electronic Warfare, No Threat Environment
What stands out immediately is what is missing. The footage does not depict any active defensive systems near the supposed target area. There is no simulated radar activity, no electronic warfare interference, no surface-to-air missile coverage, and no escort ships creating a layered defence. The missile appears to be fired into an empty stretch of water.
Modern naval warfare relies on overlapping layers of defence. It is especially true for an Indian carrier strike group, which fields long-range Barak-8 interceptors, advanced MF-STAR radars, electronic warfare suites and escort ships working together to create an integrated defensive bubble. Any anti-ship ballistic missile would have to penetrate all of these layers while the carrier group manoeuvres and deploys countermeasures.
Pakistan’s test showed none of this. The absence of these elements transforms what should be a complex, multi-layered engagement into a simple, choreographed launch.
A Carrier Group Is Not an Isolated Spot in the Ocean
Indian naval doctrine does not allow a carrier to operate independently. A carrier strike group sails with destroyers, frigates, replenishment vessels and airborne early-warning aircraft. These units constantly share data, creating a protective envelope around the carrier that can extend over dozens of kilometres.
For an anti-ship ballistic missile to stand any chance, it must track, target, and hit a moving, defended, and networked formation.
The Pakistani demonstration did not attempt to replicate any of this. No adversary vessels were depicted. There were no decoys, no evasive movement in the target area, and no effort to imitate the geometry of an actual fleet engagement. The test treated the ocean as a static environment and the target as a fixed point.
By removing all realistic variables, the demonstration skipped the hardest parts of the mission. It showed only the simplest one: firing a missile upward and landing it in a predetermined zone.
A Single Event Instead of a Realistic Operation
Another major weakness is that the launch was conducted as a stand-alone event rather than part of an operational sequence. Real naval power is measured by sensor fusion, communication networks, multi-platform coordination, and the ability to execute a strike under contested conditions.
None of this appeared in the footage. There was no evidence of: Maritime patrol aircraft; Satellite cueing; Over-the-horizon radars; Real-time targeting; and Integrated fleet operations.
It raises a critical question: How would Pakistan find and track a moving carrier group in the first place? Without that answer, the demonstration remains separated from real-world combat requirements.
Why This Matters for Credibility
Nations conduct public tests to reassure domestic audiences or deter competitors. But international military assessments are based on realism, repeatability and verified capability. A test that shows only the easiest parts of a mission does not shift strategic calculations.
Outside analysts will interpret Pakistan’s launch as a developmental event rather than an operational milestone. Pakistan has long shown the ability to fire missiles from naval platforms. What it has not shown is the ability to do so against a defended, moving, multi-layered naval force.
This gap between claim and evidence is what weakens the strategic messaging behind the test.
Optics Without Operation
Pakistan has used the launch to amplify claims that it can now threaten high-value Indian naval assets. But the visuals reveal an event that appears carefully constructed for public consumption. Without air defence, electronic warfare, fleet geometry or moving targets, the scenario demonstrates intent but not capability.
It is common in global defence communication, especially during early testing. The problem arises when basic demonstrations are portrayed as proof of full operational readiness.
A Launch Without a Battle Is Not a Capability
The conclusion is unambiguous: Pakistan displayed a missile launch, not a functioning anti-ship strike capability. The test did not show how the missile would survive Indian defensive layers, how the target would be tracked, or how the firing platform would avoid retaliation.
Modern naval strikes depend on integrated systems, sensors, networks, escorts, layered defences and resilient targeting chains, not on isolated missile launches. None of these were evident in the footage.
Until Pakistan demonstrates an ability to perform these functions in realistic, contested conditions, the test must be understood for what it was: a controlled launch, not proof of real combat reach.
A Message More Than a Milestone
Ultimately, the test reflects where Pakistan wants to be, not where it currently stands. The launch signals aspiration rather than demonstrated capability, projecting the image of maritime strength at a time when India is expanding its carrier fleet, upgrading its destroyers and strengthening air-defence networks.
For India and external observers, the event does not alter the naval balance. A highly defended carrier strike group is far beyond what a single, isolated missile launch can credibly threaten. The test lacks the kill chain, targeting ecosystem and survivability needed for real combat use.
What the demonstration really showcases is the importance of narrative in regional competition. Pakistan’s messaging attempts to fill the gap between ambition and achievement. For India, the takeaway is clear: layered defences, integrated maritime domain awareness, and carrier escort doctrines remain the decisive factors in the real battlespace, far more than a scripted launch on calm waters.
Team Bharatshakti
